ConductScience Journal

ConductScience Journal
Open AccessIssn: 1234-6789

ConductScience Journal is a dynamic, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing all areas of scientific research. Our mission is to publish high-quality, cutting-edge studies that span diverse scientific disciplines, including but not limited to, engineering, environmental science, physics, life sciences, social sciences, and technology. The journal serves as a trusted platform for researchers, academics, and professionals to share innovative findings that have the potential to drive change and contribute to the global scientific community.

Why Publish with the ConductScience Journal?

We are committed to pushing the boundaries of knowledge and facilitating the growth of interdisciplinary research. The journal values submissions that are not only scientifically rigorous but also demonstrate practical applications that could shape the future of their respective fields. Whether you are conducting fundamental research or applying scientific principles to real-world challenges, ConductScience Journal provides an ideal platform to share your discoveries with a global audience.

Publication Formats and Article Types

Our journal offers a variety of publication formats to capture the full breadth of research in health technology:

  • Research Articles: Original, comprehensive studies presenting new findings that significantly advance the field.
  • Review Articles: Detailed overviews synthesizing recent advancements and identifying future directions in specific areas of health technology.
  • Case Studies: Reports on the practical application of health technologies, offering real-world insights and lessons learned.
  • Technical Reports: Focused articles on the development, design, and testing of new health technologies, providing foundational technical knowledge.
  • Opinion and Commentary: Short pieces where thought leaders share perspectives on emerging trends, ethical issues, or future challenges.
  • Letters to the Editor: Brief communications discussing recently published articles or proposing new ideas and hypotheses.

Scope of the Journal

The journal welcomes submissions on a wide range of topics, including:

  • Advancements in technology and engineering
  • Environmental and sustainability sciences
  • Biomedical and health-related innovations
  • Social science research and its impact on society
  • Artificial intelligence, data analytics, and computational sciences
  • Physical sciences and innovations in materials
  • Ethical, regulatory, and policy implications of scientific research
  • Development of innovative medical devices
  • Digital health advancements, such as telemedicine and wearable technology
  • Biomedical engineering breakthroughs
  • Health informatics and data analytics
  • Robotics and automation in healthcare
  • Virtual and augmented reality applications in medicine
  • AI and machine learning in diagnostics and treatment
  • Ethical, regulatory, and policy implications of health technology

Upcoming Special Issue

We are excited to announce a series of special issues, each focused on a key area of interdisciplinary scientific research. Stay tuned for more details on how you can contribute to these timely and impactful topics.

Join Our Community

The ConductScience Journal is more than just a publication; it’s a vibrant academic community dedicated to shaping the future of science across all fields. By publishing with us, you’ll engage with a diverse audience of researchers, professionals, policymakers, and innovators who are all passionate about advancing the frontiers of science.

We invite you to submit your work and become part of this exciting journey!

Articles

A Scoping Review of Health AI Controversies in the Grey Literature from 2013-2022

Objective This study aimed to 1) quantify the number of controversies related to health artificial intelligence (AI) development and deployment over the past 10 years, and 2) categorize health AI controversies by theme. Materials and Methods This study is a scoping review. We queried GoogleNews for articles meeting pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria related to health AI controversies. A total of 7508 articles were queried, with 76 articles ultimately meeting criteria. Articles were quantitatively evaluated for timing and coded according to both organizational involvement and the themes of the controversies described in the article. Results Of the 76 articles, 55% were published in 2019 and 2022. No articles were published before 2016. Privacy, AI accuracy, and AI bias were the most common themes. Oversight and conflict of interest were the least common themes. Google, Babylon, and Optum were the most discussed companies. Conclusions The results demonstrate concrete evidence for many of the theoretical concerns highlighted by patient and physician surveys as well as scholarly ethics research. However, the volume of articles over the past 10 years was small. It is possible that this study was too narrow in scope, that health AI has actually not yielded a large volume of controversial events, or that news organizations have insufficiently investigated potential health AI controversies. Further research is required to develop a more complete understanding of controversial activities in health AI.

Broadband Access and Health Outcomes in FCC Priority Counties: A Longitudinal Analysis

Background: The relationship between broadband access and health outcomes is an emerging field of interest within public health research. In an increasingly digital world, it is important to understand how to best allocate broadband resources to maximize health impact and decrease health disparities. This study specifically investigates how levels of broadband connectivity are associated with health metrics for conditions such as diabetes, obesity, and preventable hospitalizations in counties identified as ‘priority’ by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) due to their low broadband access and high rates of chronic disease. Objective: To understand the longitudinal relationship between broadband access and health outcomes in priority counties, specifically focusing on diabetes, obesity, and preventable hospitalizations. Methods: This study analyzes data from 171 FCC priority counties from 2013-2020. Using regression models, we explore how broadband metrics, including broadband subscriptions and download speed, along with county characteristics such as rurality and persistent poverty, predict health outcomes. Health outcomes of interest include diabetes prevalence, obesity rates, and preventable hospitalizations. Results: A 1 percentage point increase in broadband subscriptions was associated with a 0.5% decrease in the odds of diabetes prevalence (odds ratio [OR] 0.995, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.992-0.997). No significant relationship was found between broadband and obesity rates and preventable hospitalizations. County disparities were evident, with counties experiencing persistent poverty showing a 10% increase in the odds of diabetes prevalence (OR 1.100, 95% CI 1.062-1.140) and a 20.3% increase in preventable hospitalizations (β=1.203, 95% CI 1.131-1.280, P<.001). Rural counties were predicted to have a 17.6% increase in the odds of obesity prevalence (OR 1.176, 95% CI 1.127-1.228) and a 15.1% increase in the odds of diabetes prevalence (OR 1.151, 95% CI 1.111-1.191). Conclusions: Our data suggests that increased access to broadband may be correlated with decreased rates of diabetes in FCC priority counties. The study highlights the variable relationship between broadband access and health outcomes and acknowledges health disparities in rural, persistent poverty counties. This analysis provides a baseline for understanding the dynamics between broadband and health in critical need areas. Such insights highlight how expanding broadband infrastructure, especially rural and impoverished regions where disease burden is high, may help reduce health disparities and improve healthcare service access. Future data can be incorporated to clarify causality and model how the adoption of broadband infrastructure may take time to facilitate telehealth usage and ultimately support improved health outcomes, and how these dynamics may differ depending on county characteristics.